Let’s have the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, Dear Congressman

I have written about my Congressman before, and it has never been complimentary. It is not positive in today’s post. I try to keep an open mind, but I will be surprised if I ever have anything good to say about him.

What is my latest criticism of him? He doesn’t quite tell the truth when it comes to the SAVE America Act. The SAVE America Act passed in the U.S. House of Representatives and has gone to the U.S. Senate.

U.S. Capitol
Photo by Caleb Perez on Unsplash

When my Congressman and most of the champions of the SAVE America Act try to summarize it, they say it is “just” voter ID. There is more there than meets the eye, though.

The SAVE America Act, if passed by the U.S. Senate as written for the House and, subsequently, signed into law by the President (which is a given), will require voters to show proof of U.S. citizenship.

My Congressman is proud to be a co-sponsor of the SAVE America Act. And now, to get to the title of today’s blog post, I will quote from Representative Mark Harris’ weekly email from February 14, 2026:

“Americans are required to show ID to board an airplane, open a bank account, and even enter Costco. So why are Democrats making a fuss over applying the same standard to federal elections?” He went on to call this “common sense.”

Photo by Marcus Reubenstein on Unsplash

There is simply something wrong with Mr. Harris’ paragraph: He is conflating a birth certificate with a Costco membership card. I have a Costco membership card, and I did not have to prove I was born in the United States to get it.

Mr. Harris made a serious mistake when he wrote, “applying the same standard to federal elections.” The examples he gave do not require the same standard (proof of U.S. citizenship) but we are heading toward a national requirement to have proof of citizenship in order to vote.

There is nothing wrong with that on the surface. I do not think non-citizens should vote. I also do not think more than a handful of non-citizens try to vote in the U.S. The proponents of the SAVE America Act are wielding it as a solution to a problem that does not exist.

The SAVE America Act is its proponents’ way of making it more difficult for poor and disabled people to vote. It adds unnecessary “hoops” for voters to jump through. For instance, if your current name does not match your birth certificate you must provide additional documentation to prove that you are the individual named on your birth certificate. If you don’t have easy access to transportation, gathering all your documentation and taking it to designated government offices is a burden.

I’ll let you in on a little secret… this requirement that you need to prove why you no longer go by your birth name is primarily a problem for married women. How many married women do you know who did not change their name when they got married? How many married men do you know who changed their name when they got married? I rest my case.

This will also cause anyone who was adopted to have to produce additional documentation.

To quote one of my Facebook friends, “this fuss the Democrats are making about the SAVE America Act is much ado about nothing.”  She went on to explain that “it only costs $165 to get a passport.” She obviously trusts the Trump Regime. I don’t.

I was born in the United States to American citizens. At one time, I had a U.S. passport. A passport proves citizenship. I let my passport expire and have had no reason to spend $165 to apply for a new one. That amount of money is not easy for me to come by. I am not alone in that situation. It is impossible for wealthy members of Congress and wealthy citizens to imagine that.

I recently had to renew my driver’s license. To get a “Real ID,” I had to take my birth certificate, my expiring driver’s license, and two utility bills addressed to me at my current address to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).

I tried to get an appointment at the DMV in October, but the first available appointment within 100 miles of my home was on December 31. True story. Perhaps it isn’t like that in your state, but that was my experience. My only option was to go to a DMV office, stand in line for hours, and be seen after everyone with an appointment had been seen – or be told to try again the next day. My health does not allow me to stand outside for hours, especially in the winter.

Photo by Element5 Digital on Unsplash

It remains to be seen if my “Real ID” will suffice to prove that I am qualified to vote in November 2026 or November 2028. This is an issue every American needs to pay close attention to as it works its way through the legislative branch of our federal government.

Janet

The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.

16 thoughts on “Let’s have the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, Dear Congressman

  1. They are pushing for voter ID laws, but I’m sure they are not aware that the rule is probably going to impact both Republicans and Democrats equally. I would argue it could affect Republicans even more because, given their lack of trust in the government, they are likely to push back against any attempt by the federal government to mandate another ID. I guess they already forgot who was pushing back against the COVID card.

    U.S. citizens are the only ones voting in federal elections, and that has been the law for a long time.
    I think the ID requirement, like you said, is meant to discourage people from voting. But what they may not realize, because they are so detached from reality, is that it could end up affecting Republicans more than Democrats.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I agree, Edward. Like what the FCC Chair pulled this week with Stephen Colbert’s interview with James Talarico certainly backfired as the interview blew up the YouTube stats and Talarico raised $2.5 million in 24 hours.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I’m sure Colbert will land on his feet on YouTube or elsewhere, but I will miss seeing and hearing his monologue every night at 11:30. It’s often the highlight of my day.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I watched the entire press conference this afternoon. Incredible how Trump twisted today’s Supreme Court ruling to make it sound like it was in his favor even while calling the Justices names. I don’t think I can watch his State of the Union Address on Tuesday. I just don’t think I can stand it.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I agree! I did not watch his inauguration, but the political science major in me will be tempted to watch it. I won’t decide until Tuesday night. No doubt, my wonderful Congressman will be there with a megaphone to cheer his President on! If the State of the Union makes me any angrier than his statement and press conference yesterday afternoon, I will have nightmares that night — if I’m able to sleep at all. He will probably have us in WWIII by Tuesday night.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. It’s an incredible waste of time and energy, but it seems to have found a happy home within the MAGA diehards. The more outlandish and false the claim, the more tightly they cling to it. They cannot be bothered with facts.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.