I write southern historical fiction, local history, and I've written a devotional book. The two novels I'm writing are set in Virginia and the Carolinas in the 1760s. My weekly blog started out to follow my journey as a writer and a reader, but in 2025 it has been greatly expanded to include current events and politics in the United States as I see our democracy under attack from within. The political science major in me cannot sit idly by and remain silent.
My blog post from yesterday grew to be too long, so I divided it into two parts. Before reading today’s post, it would be useful for you to read yesterday’s to put today’s post into context: Is The United States of America a Christian Nation? – Part 1.
As I stated yesterday, Christian Nationalists love to say that the United States was founded as a Christian nation, but you will not find the words “Christian” or “Jesus” in the Declaration of Independence or the U.S. Constitution.
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits the United States from making any “law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
Americans, under our Constitution, are free to practice any religion they choose. They are free to practice no religion whatsoever. That is one of the bedrocks and beauties of the United States of America.
That is why I find the likes of U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth so dangerous. As I noted in yesterday’s blog post, he sees our current war in Iran as a holy war. But the United States of America does not fight holy wars. The day we start down that road will be the beginning of our demise.
One only needs to look at the history of Europe to see how differing interpretations of Christianity in government can create great conflict. When one monarchy favors Roman Catholicism to the detriment of Protestantism… or a monarchy favors Protestantism to the detriment of Roman Catholicism we see oppression and wars.
My Presbyterian ancestors experienced that struggle in Scotland and it, no doubt, influenced them to come to America in the mid-1700s. My ancestors on the Kintyre Peninsula of Scotland had to worship in secret in the 1600s in gatherings called conventicle because the monarchy favored Roman Catholicism at the time.
(One of the historical short stories in my book, Traveling Through History: A Collection of Historical Short Stories is about the Covenanters in Scotland and how they were punished for not espousing the Roman Catholic traditions.)
In Colonial America, religious freedom and religious overreach were issues. As noted in my Author’s Notes after “You Couldn’t Help But Like Bob” story in my short story book, fines ordered by the courts in Colonial Virginia were often to be paid to the Church of England or the Anglican Church.
There was no separation of church and state in Colonial America. In Colonial North Carolina, the Episcopal church held sway over the government. It was illegal in North Carolina for a Presbyterian minister to officiate over a marriage. Marriages conducted by Presbyterian ministers were not recognized by the Royal Government. My Presbyterian colonial North Carolina ancestors were on the wrong side of the law.
It is almost impossible for 21st century Americans to comprehend how life was in colonial times. That is why it makes it so easy for Christians in 21st century America to call for the Ten Commandments to be posted on public school classroom walls and courtroom walls. They do not grasp the danger – the slippery slope – such actions can lead to.
In their hearts and minds, they think they are doing a good thing. They think they are following Jesus’ instructions found in Matthew 28:18-20: “Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”
But Jesus did not say we are to make our governments Christian. Christianity is a personal acceptance of Jesus Christ as one’s Lord and Savior. It is not a belief to be imposed upon another human being. It is not a belief system to be used as a cudgel by a government. To see it that way is blasphemous and indicates a basic misunderstanding of Jesus Christ.
Photo by Tim Wildsmith on Unsplash
In Matthew 22:15-21 (as found in the New International Version of the Bible), the Pharisees try to trap Jesus by questioning him about paying taxes:
Then the Pharisees went out and laid plans to trap him in his words. They sent their disciples to him along with the Herodians. “Teacher,” they said, “we know that you are a man of integrity and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. You aren’t swayed by others, because you pay no attention to who they are. Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay the imperial tax to Caesar or not?” But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, “You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me? Show me the coin used for paying the tax.” They brought him a denarius, and he asked them, “Whose image is this? And whose inscription?” “Caesar’s,” they replied. Then he said to them, “So give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.”
In Mark 12:13-17, that same encounter between Jesus and the Pharisees is recorded as follows in the New International Version of the Bible:
Later they sent some of the Pharisees and Herodians to Jesus to catch him in his words. They came to him and said, “Teacher, we know that you are a man of integrity. You aren’t swayed by others, because you pay no attention to who they are; but you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. Is it right to pay the imperial tax to Caesar or not? Should we pay or shouldn’t we?” But Jesus knew their hypocrisy. “Why are you trying to trap me?” he asked. “Bring me a denarius and let me look at it.” They brought the coin, and he asked them, “Whose image is this? And whose inscription?” “Caesar’s,” they replied. Then Jesus said to them, “Give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.”
Getting back to Matthew 28:18-20, yes, Jesus instructed us to spread the Gospel, but the Christians who want to force the Gospel on people by weaponizing the government with the Bible are taking the easy way out. They are taking a dangerous way out. The Bible and its words should never be used as a weapon.
Not once in the New Testament did Jesus force or instruct His followers to force His brand of religion on the government or on the people via the government.
The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America
Christians have countless ways to share the Good News of Jesus Christ with others. Forcing the Gospel on people through our government is not one of them.
Janet
The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.
Christian Nationalists love to say that the United States was founded as a Christian nation. That is simply not true.
Read the Declaration of Independence. Read the U.S. Constitution.
You will not find the word, “Christian.” You will not find the name “Jesus.”
The documents acknowledge a creator, but they do not in any way call for a national religion. In fact, read the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It makes it illegal for the United States to make any laws respecting the establishment of religion. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
That is the First Amendment. Our country’s founders were so adamant about that issue, they made it the First Amendment.
Americans, under our Constitution, are free to practice any religion they choose. They are free to practice no religion whatsoever.
Americans have the First Amendment, but there are forces working in the background and in the not so “back” background who are determined to make the United States a Christian nation. Stay tuned. Even when President Trump is no more, the Christian Nationalists who prop him up will still be among us.
The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America
One example of how Christian Nationalists are not-so-silently imposing their extreme beliefs through their positions in government is Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. He holds a monthly Christian service at the Pentagon. Attendance is technically not mandatory, but we all know how such an event at one’s place of employment can be in actuality.
We have an all-volunteer military since the draft was ended on January 27, 1973. Our military personnel come from various religious backgrounds. In other words, they are not all Christians, and besides, all Christians are not in agreement on details of the faith. The number of Christian denominations proves that.
At the Pentagon service on March 25, 2026, Hegseth prayed for “righteous targets for violence” and “overwhelming violence against those who deserve no mercy.”
Photo by Deb Dowd on Unsplash
“Righteous targets for violence” and “overwhelming violence against those who deserve no mercy.” Let those words sink in. As a member of a congregation affiliated with the Presbyterian Church USA, I find that prayer offensive.
As I interpret it, a “righteous target” for our Department of Defense would be a target acceptable to God. The insinuation of Hegseth’s prayer is that God is on our side. Even if Hegseth believes that in his heart, it runs counter to United States tradition and principles. We do not see our wars as “holy wars,” but that is the impression Hegseth’s prayer gives.
(In contrast, it is my understanding that Iran sees its war against Israel and the United States as a holy war. In Iran today, there is no separation of church and state.)
It is not in the tradition or history of the U.S. for the Secretary of Defense to use words like “righteous target” or pray for “overwhelming violence against those who deserve no mercy.” If that is the mindset of our Secretary of Defense, he has a frightening interpretation of the foundation of our nation and the religious position of the U.S. military. The U.S. military has never had a religious position or religious mission.
“Overwhelming violence against those who deserve no mercy” goes along with Hegseth’s earlier statement that we will “give no quarter.” “Give no quarter” translates to “take no prisoners alive.” In addition to being against international law, that is not the way the United States operates. If it is, that is not what we’ve been told.
Does Hegseth want the Iranians to “give no quarter” if they capture members of our military? I doubt it. But what message does it send for our Secretary of Defense to make such statements?
The Washington Post reported, “Later that day, his department announced military chaplains would no longer wear their rank on their uniform and instead would wear religious insignia.”
On Sunday, March 29, The Washington Post reported, “Retired Army Maj. Gen. Randy Manner, who was second-in-command of the National Guard from 2011 to 2012, has worked in recent years to train hundreds of interfaith military chaplains. Manner said he has talked with ‘dozens and dozens’ of active-duty chaplains in recent weeks who say those who don’t identify with Hegseth ‘are being marginalized.’ They feel they can’t voice their concerns to their own superiors, he said, and feel their work as the primary advocate for troops’ spiritual, mental and moral health is being threatened.”
It has been reported that Hegseth has cut the number of faith codes within the military from 200 to 31 to remove “political correctness and secular humanism” from the Chaplain Corps.
Hegseth has brought his pastor into presentations at the Pentagon. This is a narrow-minded man who says women should not have the right to vote. That tells me all I need to know about Hegseth’s very small Christian denomination and its views about more the half the world’s population.
The Washington Post reported that the traditional norms that kept religious beliefs and individual religious affiliations of the top brass at the Pentagon out of their official dealings, “are being upended by the proselytizing Christian campaign of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, say multiple former high-ranking military officials and experts on religion and law. Rather than boosting cohesion through a more universal spiritual uplift, they say, the new approach violates the Constitution and undermines the bonds of mutual respect between troops that are essential, especially in wartime.”
Religion and government are not a match made in heaven. Everyone in government – and that includes the military — brings their beliefs with them, but they are never to force their religious beliefs on another person, co-workers, or the entire nation through their position of power or influence.
It appears that Secretary Hegseth’s possible affinity for alcohol, which was a topic of concern emphasized during his Congressional confirmation hearings, is turning out to be the least of our concerns about him.
Watch for Part 2 of this blog topic tomorrow, when I will look into what Jesus had to say about the government.
Janet
The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.
It was on this date 156 years ago that African American men were given the right to vote when the 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified.
Section 1 of the 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
You might be surprised to know that it was the Republicans who pushed for this amendment. Yes, the same party which today turns itself into a pretzel dreaming up ways to make it more difficult for citizens to vote is the party that fought to give black American men the right to vote in 1870. The irony!
The 15th Amendment did not address the fact that women of any skin color did not have the right to vote.
Section 1 of the 15th Amendment states: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude–.”
Although ratified in 1870, it would take the Voting Rights Act of 1965 before many black people were registered to vote. Laws varied by state and state legislatures – much like today – resorted to creative ways and wording in laws to restrict voting rights.
Popular opinion is that it was only southern states that restricted voting to white people, so I decided to do a little research into state laws prior to 1870. (Keep in mind that women were not given the right to vote by the U.S. Constitution until the 19th Amendment was ratified in 1920.)
I wanted to know if black men were allowed to vote in states outside the South before passage of the 15th Amendment in 1870. Out of curiosity, I randomly looked at New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey.
In the State of New York, there was a mish-mash of voting rights for black men. In the 1820’s it was unlawful for a black person who did not own property valued at $250 or more to vote. Slave owners along the Hudson River (yes, even New Yorkers owned slaves!) did not let their slaves vote. Some black men in the state’s cities were able to vote.
Although the “Black Laws” in the state of Ohio were repealed in 1849, African Americans were still not allowed to vote. An informative article about the history of laws regarding African Americans in Ohio can be found here: https://eji.org/news/ohios-black-laws/.
What about Pennsylvania? Quoting from “The Disenfranchisement of Black Pennsylvanians in the 1838 State Constitution: Racism, Politics, or Economics? – A Statistical Analysis,” by David A. Latzko of Pennsylvania State University’s York campus, as found at https//:tupjournals.temple.edu: “In 1838, Pennsylvania’s voters approved a state constitution that restricted the right to vote to ‘white freemen.’ Blacks had voted for many years in some parts of the state, but under the new constitution Pennsylvania’s black males could no longer vote.”
I found the following information on https://libguides.njstatelib.org/votesforwomen/timeline: In 1807, a new law restricting voting was passed by the New Jersey General Assembly: “Whereas doubts have been raised, and Great diversities in practice obtained through-out the state in regard to the admission of aliens, females and persons of color, or negroes to vote in elections… Sec. 1. Be it enacted …That … no person shall vote in any state or county election… unless such person be a free, white, male … of the age of twenty-one years, worth fifty pounds proclamation money….”
New Jersey adopted a new State Constitution in 1844, and people of color were still not allowed to vote.
In the decades after the ratification of the 15th Amendment, racists in various states passed laws to make it hard for minorities to vote. Such things as poll taxes and literacy tests were codified.
This was still in the decades of Reconstruction following the Civil War. Most of the former slaves had not been allowed to learn how to read or write, so the passage of literacy laws was a not-so-subtle way to prevent many black people from voting.
My conclusion is that people of color have been discriminated against in every state in the United States of America. Our nation has a long and sorted history of dividing ourselves based on the color of our skin.
It is that 250-year history that has brought us to 2026 – a year in which the U.S. Constitution gives all citizens — regardless of skin color or gender – the right to vote. But women and people of color must remain vigilant in every State to guard our right to vote.
In 2026, various State legislatures and even the United States Congress are working behind the scenes as well as blatantly in public to make it more difficult for all citizens to exercise their right to vote. The so-called SAVE America Act is currently being batted back and forth between the U.S. House and U.S. Senate.
A segment of our society has been convinced by Conservatives that there is rampant voting by undocumented immigrants. Under the guise of putting an end to that problem — which has been proven not to exist — through passage of the SAVE America Act the Conservatives in Congress are working very hard to codify wording that will once again make it more difficult for many women and many people of color to vote.
The more things change, the more they stay the same. White men in America continue to be afraid of losing their power. It is a history much older and more widespread than the United States of America.
Janet
The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.
We have a Secretary of Health and Human Services who does not believe in science or medicine, including time-honored and scientifically-proven vaccines.
We have a Secretary of Defense who mixes a conservative evangelical religion with a statement that the U.S. will show “no quarter” as the war in Iran continues. “Giving no quarter” is in violation of international law. If the U.S. starts slaughtering its prisoners of war, we have surely lost our humanity.
The U.S. has an all-volunteer armed forces made up of people of various religions and no religious beliefs. It is not the Secretary’s place to inflict his religious beliefs on the troops. If the Secretary is a Christian, as he claims to be, I would like for him to tell me where in the Bible it quotes Jesus as advocating giving no quarter to anyone.
We have a Director of National Intelligence who said that only the U.S. President – and not the intelligence community — can determine when there is an imminent threat to our national security. It is ultimately the President’s call, but her answer on Capitol Hill yesterday made it sound like she and the intelligence community have no part to play in the process.
We have a chairman of the Federal Communications Commission who warned TV networks that they run the risk of not having their broadcast licenses renewed if they continue to report the full picture of the war in Iran. He also wants them to concentrate on “patriotic” programming this year.
We have a Secretary of Education who thinks so little of public education that she vowed to shut down the Department of Education. Perhaps she should go back to her former career in pro wrestling administration.
We have a Secretary of the Interior who is okay with opening national parks for extensive logging and oil drilling while taking down informational park displays that tell not only the good but also the bad and the ugly of our nation’s history.
We have an Attorney General who has difficulty answering questions in a way that might not align with what the President wants her to say. In fact, every Cabinet Secretary has that same problem.
All these people were hand-picked by Donald Trump to “serve” in those positions of power and influence. They also had almost 100% approval of the Republicans in Congress.
We have a U.S. President who clearly has no filter. If a segment of a thought or fantasy pops in his head, it comes out of his mouth or gets splattered all over his Truth Social account in all capital letters.
We have a U.S. President who has repeatedly called the war in Iran an “excursion” instead of an “incursion.”
On Monday, Trump said, “The President of the United States, Gavin Newscom, said that he has learning disabilities, dyslexia, everything about him is dumb.” That statement is wrong on so many levels, in addition to the fact that Trump called Gavin Newsom “the President of the United States.”
We have a U.S. President who orders shoes for his rich Cabinet members. That would have been ludicrous and inappropriate even if he had bothered to ask them their shoe size… which he did not.
We have a U.S. President who has “decorated” the Oval Office like a house of horrors… which, come to think of it… that’s what it is now.
Our closest ally, Great Britain, is now in the awkward position of advising their King not to visit the White House in April because the U.S. President might embarrass him. (I think we can guarantee that Trump will embarrass King Charles. Belittle and embarrass others is what he does best.)
We have a U.S. President who started a war without the blessing of Congress or seeking the support of the American people. Then, in the middle of a sticky situation in the Strait of Hormuz and a worldwide oil crisis, he begged our NATO allies for their help.
When our allies said, “No,” Trump said, “We don’t need NATO…. We do not need the help of anyone.” What an arrogant and short-sighted thing to say!
He said this was a test to see if NATO would ever help us. How ill-informed he is if he is not aware of NATO’s response after September 11, 2001!
Donald Trump said, “I can take Cuba… It’s a failed nation…. I can do whatever I want to with it.” What an arrogant and egotistical thing to say about a sovereign nation, even if it is on the verge of collapse!
I hope I never again hear Americans say, “We need a businessman in the White House.”
Just how bad does it have to get before we use the 25th Amendment?
If the 25th Amendment is not called for now, I shudder to think under what circumstances it would be put into force.
Part of Section 4, 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Of course, if we use the 25th Amendment now, we get J.D. Vance as our President. Vance was hand-picked by Donald Trump. Again, I shudder to think about that.
Perhaps that outcome is what is holding back everyone on both sides of the aisle from seriously pursuing the 25th Amendment.
Janet
The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.
I really try not to write about politics every day on my blog, but there are things happening that do not get coverage on the nightly news programs because there are just too many things for journalists to report on.
The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America
There’s the war in Iran. There are shootings and terrorist attacks. There’s Punch the monkey and his stuffed animal from IKEA in Tokyo. There’s the Kīlauea volcano blowing its stack in Hawaii. There are the women who were abused by Jeffrey Epstein and his rich friends who apparently are not going to face consequences in the United States like they are in Great Britain.
In a 30-minute news broadcast, minus eight to ten minutes of commercials, a host of happenings fall on the editor’s floor. Today I will touch on a few of those.
Trump’s attitude about the war in Iran
President Trump wants other countries to police the Strait of Hormuz. We’ll see how that goes. He also wants the crews on oil tankers to just be brave and go through the strait. Easy for him to say.
He wants China, France, Japan, South Korea, the United Kingdom and “others” to send warships there to secure the two-mile wide passage. He says things will go “well” with the U.S. coordinating things.
The President said the U.S. may hit Iran’s Kharg Island a few more times “just for fun.” His cavalier attitude over putting American military personnel is harm’s way and spending U.S. tax dollars is deplorable. This is not a video game.
President Trump says he will know when the war is over because he “will feel it in his bones.” He started the war because he “had a feeling.” As a student of history, I don’t recall any other U.S. President approaching a war based on “feelings.”
Can you imagine the misogynistic outcry there would be if a female U.S. President ever said such a thing? She would be the last female U.S. President!
One day he calls the war “a war.” The next day he calls it “an excursion.” The objectives of the war change hourly.
If we get to have a Presidential election in 2028, I hope voters will remember the ramifications when we elect a President who is unable to communicate their objectives or their dependence on facts.
The FCC
After President Trump accused the news media of “intentionally misleading” the public in their coverage of the war in Iran, Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr threatened to revoke broadcasters’ licenses.
We’ve heard these threats before from the Trump Administration, as they try to dictate news coverage.
This is an attack on the free press and a major foundation of our nation. Countries like Russia, China, and North Korea have state-controlled television. We cannot allow this to happen in the United States! If you want to watch and listen to state-controlled TV, you can watch Fox News.
Carr warned that a network’s coverage of the war in Iran will be taken into consideration when their broadcast licenses come up for renewal. In a social media post, Carr warned them that they still had a chance to “correct course” and stop broadcasting “fake news” and distortions of the war.
Carr wrote, “The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will lose their licenses if they do not.”
He accused broadcast networks of “running hoaxes.”
Carr doubled down on this in an interview with CBS News later on Saturday.
The trouble is that the law is left to interpretation now. Until recently, it was generally agreed that the news media should be free to report facts. Under the Trump Administration, they are being pressured to only report things that put Trump in a good light. This is what they have in autocracies like Russia, China, and North Korea.
Carr has encouraged broadcast networks to air “patriotic pro-America content” this year as we mark the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. But when a politically-appointed FCC Chair starts to dictate broadcast content, we and the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution are under attack.
When the politician in power gets to decide the definition of “public interest,” freedom of the press is in peril.
We have not heard the last of this. If push comes to shove, I imagine we will see a case going before the U.S. Supreme Court.
I only took one Constitutional Law course in college, so I’m no expert; however, I know under the First Amendment to the Constitution it is illegal for the government to censor free speech.
Print media
The President criticized The Wall Street Journal for reporting last Friday that Iran had damaged five U.S. Air Force tanker planes in Saudi Arabia. It seems he did not want that reported to the public. He insisted that four of those planes had “virtually no damage and are already back in service.”
He is so thin-skinned that he takes honest journalism as a personal affront.
He called The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal “Lowlife ‘Papers’ and accused them of wanting the U.S. to lose the war. He called journalists “sick and demented people.”
Janet
The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.
Donald Trump and Israel started a war with Iran just after midnight Eastern Time on Saturday. I say “Donald Trump” and not “the United States” because Trump did this without the blessing of the U.S. Congress. He did this after telling the American people that, if elected, he would not start a war.
This is the man who was furious over not being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
There must be “an imminent threat” against the American people for the U.S. President to take such an action. Democrat members of the U.S. Congress are furious and saying that intelligence reports indicated no such threat.
The U.S. Constitution gives the U.S. Congress the power to declare war. In this case, the Congress was not even informed that this was about to happen.
As I write this on Sunday night, Iran is retaliating by bombing numerous countries where the U.S. has military bases. Three U.S. military service members were killed and five seriously injured in a Iranian drone attack on a U.S. military base in Kuwait.
It has been reported that Lebanon has bombed Israel and Israel has bombed Lebanon.
No one knows what the near or far future holds as a result of this attack on Iran.
Trump says he joined Israel to take this action to save American lives – not today, but in the future. He expects the Iranian people, who are not organized and have few resources, to now waltz in and create a new government since the bombs have killed the supreme leader of Iran, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
I don’t see that happening. It would be wonderful if the Iranians, who have suffered under a brutal regime for 47 years could take control of their government, but I fear they do not have the wherewithal to do that.
I see the U.S. mired in another endless war started on a whim by a man who dodged the draft five times during the Vietnam War.
By the time this blog post “goes live” eight hours from now at 5:00 a.m. Monday, Eastern Time, there is no telling what will have happened.
I’m a “night owl,” so I was still awake after midnight last Friday night when I learned that Trump and Israel had started this war in Iran. I had already planned my second DIY (Do It Yourself) Writing Retreat for Saturday afternoon.
It was difficult to turn off the TV and distract my brain from current events and focus on 1768 in North Carolina, but I managed to do that.
I needed to make a major change in my historical novel’s plotline. Research last week had uncovered a fact that changed the course of the story somewhat. That necessitated deleting many paragraphs, rewriting others, and juggling some scenes.
It was tedious work, but I committed to it for around six hours. The result was a net gain of 2,200 words – one of my most productive writing days. My word count stands at 60,000. I’m aiming for 90,000 words.
After accepting the fact last week that I am a binge writer and I cannot force myself to set daily business hours to work on my novel, freed me to stop feeling guilty for not working on it every day. I plan to schedule more DIY Writing Retreats in the near future as I continue to find a writing process that suits me.
I plan to blog about the last story – which is more of an essay – in my latest book, Traveling Through History: A Collection of Historical Short Stories, on Tuesday. I’ll just “wing it” after Tuesday, depending on what the coming days bring.
Janet
The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.
I celebrated the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on Friday in the Learning Resources, Inc v. Trump case! FINALLY! Finally, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to rein in Donald Trump’s overreach of presidential powers!
In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the tariffs Trump has inflicted on other nations (and, ultimately, the American consumer!) over the last 13 months under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were illegal. The Court ruled that the IEEPA cannot be used to impose tariffs.
The Court reminded Trump that tariffs are a form of taxation, and taxation is a power of the U.S. Congress – not the U.S. President.
Trump did not take the Court’s decision well, to put it lightly.
Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash
Trump responded by making one of his typically rambling, long statements, calling the U.S. Supreme Court Justices derogatory names including, “fools and lapdogs for RINOs” (Republicans in Name Only). He accused them of being anti-American and under the influence of foreigners. He said they should be ashamed of themselves and their families should be ashamed of them. It went on and on from there. I cannot quote his entire rant here.
Following his statement, he held a press conference in which he refused to answer a question from CNN (calling the news network “fake news” because he is offended by the truth) and answered the questions posed by other reporters and journalists as vaguely as he chose.
The event was a display by Trump unlike any other statement and press conference by any other U.S. President in history. He was a toddler whose parents had said, “No,” but whose parents had then left him to his own devices and allowed him to vent his anger and frustration on the world stage. There are no guardrails on his words and temper.
His remarks would have been embarrassing; however, after 13 months, I will not be embarrassed by anything Trump says or does. I did not vote for him. I have not been shy about expressing my opinions about Trump and his childish incompetence, hatefulness, racism, and disregard for the U.S. Constitution.
I watched his entire public statement and press conference on Friday afternoon. In a word, it was horrible. In other words, it was painfully indicative of how Trump believes he is above the law and can do anything he wants to do. He said, “I can do anything I want to do.” It wasn’t the first time he has said that.
In addition to lashing out at individual U.S. Supreme Court Justices who had been appointed to the Court by Trump himself and from whom he expects loyalty to him instead of loyalty to the U.S. Constitution, he then twisted the ruling into a pretzel by quoting at length the dissenting opinion of Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
Although a dissenting opinion in a U.S. Supreme Court decision is not law – it is part of the minority opinion, — Trump clung to Kavanaugh’s words and later said that Kavanaugh is his “new hero.” (I can’t help but think back to Kavanaugh’s Senate confirmation hearings in 2018 after Trump nominated him. All I can remember from the hearings is Kavanaugh’s repeated, angry defense, “I like beer!” Not exactly “hero” material in my book.)
In the press conference, Trump said nothing will change. He will continue to impose any tariffs he desires. He announced a new 10% global tariff on top of all the existing tariffs. On Saturday, he announced the new global tariff will 15% instead of 10%.
There’s no telling what that global tariff will be by the time this blog post goes live on Monday, February 23. (I am writing it on February 21.) This new global tariff is imposed using Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. That Act allows the U.S. President to impose duties up to 15% for 150 days to deal with “large and serious” balance-of-payment issues. Friday and Saturday’s 15% global tariff takes effect today.
Trump indicated that he is exploring additional ways to get around the Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump ruling. His Commerce Department, headed by Howard Lutnick of Epstein file fame, is investigating Trump’s options.
Trump’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, and motor vehicle imports were not affected by Friday’s Supreme Court ruling.
As only Trump can do, he portrays himself as the most pitiful victim in history and repeated on Friday that the United States is the most victimized country in history. As a 73-year-old American, I have never felt that the United States was a victim. I have counted it a privilege to have been born in and lived my entire life in the most blessed and prosperous country in the world.
For the first 72 years of my life, the United States was the “beacon on a hill.” It was the world’s symbol of freedom. It continues to be the world’s greatest experiment in democracy, but it is currently being tested from within like it has not been tested since the Civil War in the 1860s.
Just as people in the midst of a war or national crisis don’t know what the outcome will be, I don’t know how this greatest experiment in democracy will end. However, Friday’s 6-3 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court was the first ray of hope I have seen in 13 months.
Janet
The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.
I have written about my Congressman before, and it has never been complimentary. It is not positive in today’s post. I try to keep an open mind, but I will be surprised if I ever have anything good to say about him.
What is my latest criticism of him? He doesn’t quite tell the truth when it comes to the SAVE America Act. The SAVE America Act passed in the U.S. House of Representatives and has gone to the U.S. Senate.
U.S. Capitol Photo by Caleb Perez on Unsplash
When my Congressman and most of the champions of the SAVE America Act try to summarize it, they say it is “just” voter ID. There is more there than meets the eye, though.
The SAVE America Act, if passed by the U.S. Senate as written for the House and, subsequently, signed into law by the President (which is a given), will require voters to show proof of U.S. citizenship.
My Congressman is proud to be a co-sponsor of the SAVE America Act. And now, to get to the title of today’s blog post, I will quote from Representative Mark Harris’ weekly email from February 14, 2026:
“Americans are required to show ID to board an airplane, open a bank account, and even enter Costco. So why are Democrats making a fuss over applying the same standard to federal elections?” He went on to call this “common sense.”
Photo by Marcus Reubenstein on Unsplash
There is simply something wrong with Mr. Harris’ paragraph: He is conflating a birth certificate with a Costco membership card. I have a Costco membership card, and I did not have to prove I was born in the United States to get it.
Mr. Harris made a serious mistake when he wrote, “applying the same standard to federal elections.” The examples he gave do not require the same standard (proof of U.S. citizenship) but we are heading toward a national requirement to have proof of citizenship in order to vote.
There is nothing wrong with that on the surface. I do not think non-citizens should vote. I also do not think more than a handful of non-citizens try to vote in the U.S. The proponents of the SAVE America Act are wielding it as a solution to a problem that does not exist.
The SAVE America Act is its proponents’ way of making it more difficult for poor and disabled people to vote. It adds unnecessary “hoops” for voters to jump through. For instance, if your current name does not match your birth certificate you must provide additional documentation to prove that you are the individual named on your birth certificate. If you don’t have easy access to transportation, gathering all your documentation and taking it to designated government offices is a burden.
I’ll let you in on a little secret… this requirement that you need to prove why you no longer go by your birth name is primarily a problem for married women. How many married women do you know who did not change their name when they got married? How many married men do you know who changed their name when they got married? I rest my case.
This will also cause anyone who was adopted to have to produce additional documentation.
To quote one of my Facebook friends, “this fuss the Democrats are making about the SAVE America Act is much ado about nothing.” She went on to explain that “it only costs $165 to get a passport.” She obviously trusts the Trump Regime. I don’t.
I was born in the United States to American citizens. At one time, I had a U.S. passport. A passport proves citizenship. I let my passport expire and have had no reason to spend $165 to apply for a new one. That amount of money is not easy for me to come by. I am not alone in that situation. It is impossible for wealthy members of Congress and wealthy citizens to imagine that.
I recently had to renew my driver’s license. To get a “Real ID,” I had to take my birth certificate, my expiring driver’s license, and two utility bills addressed to me at my current address to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).
I tried to get an appointment at the DMV in October, but the first available appointment within 100 miles of my home was on December 31. True story. Perhaps it isn’t like that in your state, but that was my experience. My only option was to go to a DMV office, stand in line for hours, and be seen after everyone with an appointment had been seen – or be told to try again the next day. My health does not allow me to stand outside for hours, especially in the winter.
Photo by Element5 Digital on Unsplash
It remains to be seen if my “Real ID” will suffice to prove that I am qualified to vote in November 2026 or November 2028. This is an issue every American needs to pay close attention to as it works its way through the legislative branch of our federal government.
Janet
The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.
In my blog post last Friday, I promised a near future post about U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi.
If you saw her performance last Wednesday in front of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, you probably do not want to be reminded of it. I saw all of it that was televised, and I wish I could unsee and unhear it.
The audacity of Pam Bondi to prance into The Capitol and call members of Congress names! It was a circus but not an entertaining one. It was an embarrassment. Her body language alone was abhorrent, not to mention her trash mouth.
Photo by Simon Ray on Unsplash
It was a performance meant for one person only: Donald Trump. I am sure he thought it was a brilliant display. Even when she was reminded that it is her job and sworn duty to uphold the U.S. Constitution and to represent the United States of America (i.e., the people!) in all her dealings as U.S. Attorney General, she continued to call members of Congress derogatory names and refuse to look the Democrats on the committee in the eyes.
The hearing was supposed to be for Bondi to give U.S. Representatives some answers about the Epstein files and the recent and current operations of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Instead, it was half pep rally for Trump and half demonstration of how sarcastic and snarky the current U.S. Attorney General can be when facing legitimate questions that make her squirm.
In case you missed the performance, when being asked questions by Republicans on the committee, Bondi smiled and gushed. She thanked them profusely for “asking that question.” When asked “a yes or no” question, she replied accordingly.
When asked questions by a Democrat on the committee, Bondi made a great show of shuffling the papers in front of her and looking down. She was suddenly busy, busy, busy. Instead of answering “yes or no” questions by Democrats, she deflected – usually by turning to that Congress member’s section in her three-ring binder so she could attack that Representative personally with a reference (true or not) to a vote that Representative made sometime in their career along with her editorial comments (true or false).
She repeatedly said, “Mr. Chairman, I refuse to get down in the gutter with these people.” She called one of them “a washed-up lawyer.” She hurled various insults at most of the Democrats. The fact that she had that three-ring binder at her fingertips was visible evidence of her disdain for every Democrat Congress member. She used the same binder when testifying before a U.S. Senate Committee.
She accused one member of the committee of being antisemitic, even though that member’s grandfather died in the Holocaust.
Even the BBC questioned why Bondi lost her temper in the hearing.
Early in the hearing, survivors of the sexual abuse at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein and his rich and political friends in high places were asked to stand where they were seated in the audience. Bondi never acknowledged their presence. Even when asked by at least one member of the committee to turn around and look at the survivors and family members of at least one victim who is now deceased, Bondi would not do it. She is apparently incapable of looking truth in the face.
Bondi cares not that she is now the U.S. Attorney General because she was confirmed for that position by the Congress of the United States. She has a particularly peculiar way of showing her appreciation for the misguided confidence they put in her after her shaky confirmation hearings last year in which she said she would not “weaponize” the U.S. Department of Justice. Yet, that is all she has done since assuming office. I have heard people who knew and respected her as the State Attorney General in Florida say they no longer recognize her as the person they used to know.
Her behavior was bizarre, to say the least. When asked a question about the Epstein files, she “answered” by touting the fact that the stock market reached and broke the 50,000 mark the day before, then bristled when a Democrat on the committee asked, “What does that have to do with the Epstein files?”
It was horrible to see and hear a U.S. Attorney General stoop to such childish and insulting behavior. Such behavior as demonstrated by Bondi would not be tolerated in a court of law, and it should not have been tolerated in the U.S. Capitol. She should have been held in contempt of Congress, but she wasn’t because the committee is chaired by a Republican – a very self-righteous Republican who does not have enough respect for the institution or his position in Congress to even wear a suit.
In “answering” one question, she waxed poetic about what a wonderful U.S. President Donald J. Trump is. It was gag-worthy and inappropriate.
The U.S. Attorney General is not supposed to be beholding to the U.S. President.
The person in that position is not supposed to be political.
The person in that position is not supposed to be a cheerleader or public relations representative for the U.S. President.
The U.S. Attorney General is not supposed to do the President’s bidding.
In just one year, Bondi has broken every time-honored rule – written and unwritten — governing her position.
Janet
The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.
Pull up a comfortable chair. This post is long, but I believe its length stands as proof of the chaos here just in the last week or two. I considered breaking it up between two days, but I think its length alone makes a point.
In case you are wondering why I did not blog yesterday about Wednesday’s performance for Donald Trump by Pam Bondi, I did not have time to digest it and spit it onto the page. That will come either tomorrow or on Monday of next week.
Oh, daily life pretty much goes on as usual except in cities being targeted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. People must continue to work to support themselves and their families. Children need to continue to attend school. Life goes on, but life would be less stressful if we weren’t slammed every day with unnecessary crises.
I have taken the gloves off this week. Perhaps you noticed, if you’ve read my last four blog posts.
I know I irritate people who cling to Donald Trump, but I offer no apologies. Not because I see apologizing as a weakness (like Trump does), but because I refuse to apologize for standing up for the U.S. Constitution and the ideals upon which my country was formed.
As I tell the Trumpers who attack me on Facebook, you don’t have to read what I post. I have the right to post it and you have the right not to read it. If you want to convince me I’m a left-wing woke radical, don’t bother. I wear that moniker proudly.
I feel compelled to blog about more than a dozen things today that have me concerned or, at the least, intrigued.
Not a day passes without at least one piece of alarming news coming out of the Trump regime or from his followers. Most days there are so many pieces of alarming news that it feels like we Americans are being gut-punched by a fire hose.
That’s all part of the plan. That’s the only way they can ram Project 2025 down our throats and “take back” the “good old days” when blacks and women had no rights and few people spoke truth to power.
I try to keep up. I take notes. I pay attention. I get my news from various sources. But I cannot keep up. Things fall through the cracks. It’s overwhelming – which is all part of their plan.
Americans are weary. We are tired of the fire hose of hate and destruction. We. Are. Tired. That is part of their plan.
They are hellbent on confusing us with lies and throwing so much chaos at us 24/7 that we give up.
You will find that I freely refer to Republicans in this post. I hate to throw all Republicans under the bus, but I have lost my patience over the last 13 months. The Republican Party has blindly and completely embraced Donald Trump and everything he says and does, so I no longer feel the need to tiptoe around them.
If you are a Republican and have not removed yourself from that affiliation, I am left to assume that you agree with Donald Trump. It is his political party now. With rare exceptions, no one in the party has the gumption to challenge anything he says or does.
If you are a registered Republican and you have remained silent as Donald Trump has stomped all over the U.S. Constitution, torn down the East Wing of the White House, ordered masked men to round up people with Spanish accents – including children – and warehoused them, been found guilty of 34 felonies, bragged about grabbing women by their genitals, published racist words and images on social media, threatened our allies, taken Putin’s word over that of U.S. intelligence organizations, slapped his name on the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts (and announced its closure on July 4, 2026), and lied to your face about more things than you can count… then perhaps you need to do some soul searching.
Silence is complicity.
Full disclosure: I used to be a registered Republican. I’m not proud of that. I was young and misguided. I have voted for Republicans and I have voted for Democrats. I used to “vote for the person, not the party,” but those days are over for the foreseeable future. I cannot in good conscience cast a vote for a Republican in light of what the Republicans in the North Carolina General Assembly have done to destroy public education and what the Trump Administrations have done to every facet of our country.
Photo by Larry Alger on Unsplash
Hurrah for that Grand Jury!
The American people had a victory this week! A Grand Jury – made up of average Americans – refused to indict two U.S. Senators and four U.S. Representatives who participated in a video in which they merely stated the law: If you are in the U.S. military, you do not have to carry out an illegal order.
In fact, the Nazis who followed Hitler’s orders found at during the Nuremberg Trials that they didn’t have to carry out illegal orders. It is international law, not just U.S. law.
Donald Trump and Pam Bondi weaponized the U.S. Department of Justice when they tried to prosecute Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona, Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, Chris Deluzio of Pennsylvania, and Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania for making a video in which they simply stated that members of the military do not have to follow illegal orders.
It infuriated Trump for these military veterans and lawmakers to remind the American public – not just military personnel – that there is a law of humanity in place. He ordered the U.S. Department of Justice, which he thinks is and treats as if it is his personal law firm, to go after those six members of Congress.
Trump called those six Democrat members of Congress “seditious” when the video aired. He wanted them to be executed for stating the law.
It would have been wonderful if the Republican members of Congress had shown outrage over Trump’s remarks. It would have been wonderful and encouraging if the Republican members of Congress had shown outrage over the attempted prosecution of their fellow lawmakers.
I believe we will see more such failures of the U.S. Department of Justice as it is headed by a woman who is only there to try to carry out Trump’s vindictive wishes.
FBI raid of Fulton County, Georgia, Elections Records
On January 28, 2026, the FBI raided the building where the voting records from Fulton County, Georgia, from the 2020 presidential election were housed. Some 656 boxes of ballots, ballot images, tabulators, and voter rolls were seized by the FBI and taken to an undisclosed location.
Even though voter registration records in the United States are public information and easily found on the Internet, it is creeper for the FBI to seize a county’s voter registration rolls.
The icing on the cake was that Trump spoke directly via telephone to the FBI agents who participated just minutes after the raid. That is not what the President of the United States is supposed to do. Until Trump assumed office in January 2025, the FBI was apolitical. The U.S. President is not supposed to direct, interfere with, or in any way get involved in the FBI investigations.
Fulton County filed suit against the Trump Administration to try to get the records back.
Until forced to this week, the Trump Administration gave no justification for the January 28, 2026, seizure, but Brad Raffensperger is running for Governor and Trump has endorsed his opponent.
You will recall that Trump called Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on January 2, 2021 and asked Raffensperger to “find” him 11,780 votes. That action by Trump should have disqualified him to ever run for office again, but it didn’t.
Trump will never accept the fact that he lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden. His fragile ego cannot accept that he lost. “Loser” is one of the worst things he can think of to call someone.
Therefore, even though the Fulton County, Georgia votes were re-counted by hand twice after the initial count on election night in 2020, Trump thought he could pressure a state with a Republican Governor, a Republican Secretary of State, and a Republican Lt. Governor to cave and “find” him the votes he did not receive.
He accused the vote counters of cheating. He knows so little about how strictly ballots are counted, preserved, and transported that he made up lies about the containers holding the ballots and specifically two black women who helped count the votes.
So now the 2020 votes from Fulton County, Georgia, are who knows where. The Fulton County Board of Elections is responsible for the security of those ballots, but the Trump Administration has seized them and taken them to an undisclosed location.
As of February 9, Fulton County officials had not been told where the records they are responsible for were being held or what had been done with them or to them. As I write this on February 12, I cannot find that they have found out where those records are being held. The 2020 Fulton County voters don’t know what is being done with their personal information.
Last week, a federal judge ordered the FBI to unseal and reveal the warrant used on January 28 in Fulton County no later than Tuesday, February 10. Much to my surprise, the affidavits associated with the warrant were unsealed on Tuesday afternoon.
WSB-TV in Atlanta reported, “According to the documents, the FBI was told to investigate a discrepancy in the vote counts reported by Fulton County election officials, with the warrant alleging that there were missing ballot images from the 2020 election records.”
Here we are in 2026, still having to prove that Joe Biden won the 2020 election. Why are none of the Republicans who were elected in 2020 claiming that the election was rigged? Odd how that worked out. Only Donald Trump is crying “foul.”
If you think the seizure of the Fulton County, Georgia, voting records does not pertain to you because you don’t live there, just think how you would feel if the FBI seized the voting records of your county. If they can do it in Atlanta, they can do it anywhere.
FBI briefing
Election officials from all 50 states have been summoned to an FBI briefing on “preparations for the midterms” on February 25. The email from the FBI was said to be from Kellie Hardiman, “FBI Election Executive.” I believe this briefing is unusual.
ICE, Steve Bannon, November mid-term elections
In a related matter, last week former Trump bestie and jailbird Steve Bannon proudly announced that ICE agents will surround the polling places in November. Of course, ICE agents do not work for Steve Bannon. (Thank goodness!) But Trump and his minions are wasting no time in trying to scare voters away from the polls. They continue to operate under the delusion that undocumented immigrants vote. They spend a lot of their time focusing on remedies for problems that do not exist, like voter fraud.
ICE statistics
Trump took office on January 20, 2025, promising to immediately get rid of “the worst of the worst.” He often claims that immigrants are murderers, rapists, and dangerous gang members. “The worst of the worst.”
It is hard to get reliable statistics about the arrests made by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), but some interesting numbers have been reported by various news outlets this week. I’m sure these percentages could be off my two or three percentage points, but these are the numbers I have read:
From January 25, 2025 through January 31, 2026, 40% of those arrested and detained have no criminal records, 14% are violent criminals, and less than 2% are gang members.
I have heard more than one county sheriff say they can only keep an undocumented immigrant in custody for 48 hours. If ICE agents don’t come to pick those prisoners up in 48 hours, they must be released. Perhaps it would be a better use of ICE agents if they would pick up the undocumented immigrants already in local police custody instead of it taking five ICE agents to murder a nurse who has knelt in the aid of a woman said agents have shoved to the ground.
The New START treaty
Remember The New START treaty between the United States and Russia? It was signed in 2011. Trump let it expire on February 5 while he was waxing poetic at the 74th Annual Prayer Breakfast. With the treaty’s expiration, there’s no longer a cap on the number of nuclear weapons either country can have.
I’m not sure which part of that equation worries me more, since Trump’s finger is on “the red button.”
Does this fall under the red “Make America Safe Again” baseball cap?
The National Governors Association Annual Meeting
It came to light last week that Maryland Governor Wes Moore – the only black governor in the U.S. – had been uninvited to the 2026 National Governors Association (NGA) dinner at the White House on February 20. Governors of every state, commonwealth, and territory in the United States are automatically members. Their annual dinner at the White House is a time for all of the governors and their spouses to get together, share best practices on a non-partisan basis, and have dinner with the President of the United States, Cabinet members, and other government officials.
I jumped to the conclusion that this was another case of racism; however, according to the last report I read, Colorado Governor Jared Polis, also a Democrat, has also been uninvited
Gov. Moore serves as Vice Chair of the National Governors Association. He was elected to that position by a non-partisan vote.
It was reported by Reuters on Tuesday, February 10, that the NGA’s annual meeting with Trump has been cancelled. Brandon Tatum, CEO of the NGA, released a statement saying, “To disinvite individual governors to the White House sessions undermines an important opportunity for federal-state collaboration.” He also said, “At this moment in our nation’s history, it is critical that institutions continue to stand for unity, dignity and constructive engagement.”
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the president “can invite whomever he wants to dinner and events here at the White House.” It seems that someone has forgotten that the White House belongs to the American people, not to any sitting U.S. President. Of course, that became blatantly clear the day Trump demolished the East Wing.
According to The New York Times, Trump did the uninviting.
Does this “Make America Great Again?”
The possible renaming of Penn Station
Trump claimed that it was U.S. Senator Chuck Shummer’s idea that Penn Station in New York City could be renamed for Trump. Shummer denied it.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed in Tuesday’s press briefing that it was Trump’s idea, not Shummer’s.
Ooops!
What they think is “fake outrage”
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told us to stop our “fake outrage” last Friday after the photograph of former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama with their heads on ape bodies was posted on Trump’s Truth Social account for 12 hours.
The only fake outrage I saw on display last week (and continuing this week) was Republicans who were in an uproar that a Puerto Rican performer, “Bad Bunny” was headlining the Super Bowl halftime show. They said he wasn’t American. They said only Americans should perform during the Super Bowl.
But Bad Bunny is American. Puerto Rico is part of the United States. Why else did Trump go there and throw rolls of paper towels at them in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria in 2017 during his first term in office? Did he understand then that Puerto Rico is a U.S. territory? By the way, that’s when he discovered that Puerto Rico is an island, but I digress.
Besides the point that Puerto Ricans are American citizens, perhaps the Republicans can explain why they were not outraged when Phil Collins of Great Britain performed in Super Bowl XXXIV, U2 from Ireland in Super Bowl XXXVI, Shania Twain from Canada in Superbowl XXXVII, Paul McCartney in Super Bowl XXXIX, and Coldplay in Super Bowl L? Do you want more examples of “foreigners” performing at the Super Bowl?
It appears that the Republicans’ outrage over Bad Bunny is the fact that his first language is Spanish and he chose to sing in Spanish for the Super Bowl on Sunday.
Music has no language. Music has a beat, a mood, a spirit, a way of tugging at your emotions no matter the language in which the words are sung.
Sadly, though, I don’t think the outrage about Bad Bunny was fake. I think they were dead serious.
They see Americans of European descent becoming a minority in a few years, and the only way they know to deal with it is to lash out, call names, and discriminate. That’s their modus operandi.
Trump posted his displeasure over Bad Bunny again during the Super Bowl. He whined because he couldn’t understand a word Bad Bunny sang. He claimed that “nobody” could understand it. It’s too bad Trump did not celebrate all the countries in the Americas, like Bad Bunny did. I guess Trump did not agree with the huge “The only thing more powerful than hate is love” sign during the performance. That is obviously a concept and core value that Trump cannot fathom.
The Make America Great Again alternative half-time show featured Kid Rock, whose song lyrics should be considered cringe-worthy by the MAGA crowd who claim to be “the party of family values.”
The Epstein Files
U.S. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick can’t seem to get his story straight about his association with Jeffrey Epstein. He admits that he took his children to Epstein’s private island and residence in 2012. Lutnick had earlier said that he cut off all contact with Epstein in 2005, calling him “gross.”
Democrats in Congress are calling for Lutnick to resign.
Republicans used to call for the release of all the Epstein files, but Trump said last week that “it’s time to move on.” Nothing to see here.
The only person who has gone to prison for the raping of countless young girls on Epstein’s property is a woman.
Oh, the irony!
Speaking of irony… U.S. Olympic skier Hunter Hess
U.S. Olympic skier Hunter Hess dared to express his displeasure with ICE killing American citizens in Minneapolis. Hess is quoted as saying, “I think, for me, it’s more I’m representing my friends and family back home, the people that represented it before me, all the things that I believe are good about the U.S. If it aligns with my moral values, I feel like I’m representing it. Just because I’m wearing the flag doesn’t mean I represent everything that’s going on in the U.S.”
Trump took offense. He takes offense at anyone who speaks their mind if their opinions do not line up with his. When he is offended, he goes on the attack. It’s all he knows to do.
This was Trump’s response on Truth Social to what Hunter Hess said: “U.S. Olympic Skier, Hunter Hess, a real Loser, says he doesn’t represent his Country in the current Winter Olympics. If that’s the case, he shouldn’t have tried out for the Team, and it’s too bad he’s on it.”
That’s not all Trump wrote about Hess, but you get the point even though to read his social media posts you must meander your way through randomly-capitalized words. They must have had top-notch English teachers at those expensive private schools he attended.
In the old days, if a U.S. President with extremely thin skin wanted to call a citizen or member of the U.S. Olympic team a name, he probably just muttered under his breath, but today Trump puts everything out there in cyberspace for the world to see.
The wife of Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller weighed in, too. She said that if you don’t love America you should be representing it in the Olympics. What she and other Republicans cannot grasp is that we who protest and voice our anger and disappointment and disgust at what the Trump Administration is doing… we do it BECAUSE we love America! They think we hate America. No, we love America and we mourn for what the Trump Administration has done to destroy this once beacon of freedom.
By the way, Mrs. Miller, the First Amendment gives us freedom of speech, just like it gives freedom of speech to you.
U.S. Senator Rick Scott of Florida also weighed in. He twisted Hunter Hess’s words. Hess did not say he did not want to represent the United States. Senator Scott has been quoted as saying that the United States is a “for freedom and democracy,” but he doesn’t think an American participating in the 2026 Winter Olympics has freedom of speech.
Trump’s supporters, of which Rick Scott is one, think it is all right for Trump to say derogatory things about the United States, its elected representatives, its member states, its cities, and segments of its population.
I guess that’s more accurately described as hypocrisy instead of irony.
National Park informational displays and signs
It’s not getting publicity by the major news outlets, but the underground reports almost weekly of informational displays and signage being removed from our National Parks. Any display or sign that conveys an unfortunate or evil piece of United States history is being removed.
Displays about the removal and abuse of indigenous peoples, displays about slavery, and displays giving scientific facts about climate change are especially being targeted and removed.
United States history is being rewritten and erased. I shudder to think of future school history books that will be adopted by right-wing state school boards.
The “Melania” film by Amazon
It seems that music composed by Jonny Greenwood for the Daniel Day-Lewis movie, “Phantom Thread,” was used in “Melania’ without permission. Greenwood and “Phantom Thread” director Paul Thomas Anderson have asked for that music to be removed from “Melania.”
Although Greenwood does not hold the copyright to that piece of music he composed, use of it without permission from Universal is a breach of his composer’s agreement.
This is not the first time members of the Trump family have used music without permission. They seem to have little or no respect for copyright law or related law.
A ray of light on tariffs
Reports indicate that Trump’s tariffs, which he said would “Make America Rich Again,” cost the average American family $1,000 in 2025 and will cost them $1,300 in 2026 if left in place.
In a slightly bi-partisan vote of 219-211 in the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday, the House adopted a resolution calling for Trump to remove tariffs on Canada.
In response, Trump threatened the six Republicans who voted for the resolution.
The Gordie Howe Bridge
Canada has built and paid for a bridge from Windsor, Ontario to Detroit, Michigan. Be sure to remember the phrase “and paid for.”
Those of us who live more than 500 miles from Detroit have not heard much about it.
The Gordie Howe International Bridge cost C$6.4 billion ($4.6 billion US) and was scheduled to open early this year. It is a grand bridge with six lanes for vehicular traffic plus bike lanes and pedestrian walkways. Government agencies in both countries worked together to select the name for the bridge.
Canada built the bridge “to make automotive trade between the two countries easier,” according to Forbes.
In a nutshell, the Ambassador Bridge, which opened in 1929, is currently the main automotive trade traffic carrier between the two countries, but the bridge’s owner (Detroit International Bridge Company) has been crossways with Canada for the last two decades or so. For instance, the company made plans to build another bridge right beside the Ambassador Bridge. The older bridge would be relegated to emergency traffic. Canada objected to that plan.
Canada proposed a new bridge to be built with the state of Michigan. and Canada sharing construction costs. Michigan declined, so Canada decided to finance construction of the Gordie Howe Bridge itself. During Trump’s first term in office, it was agreed that this would be a toll bridge and tolls collected would pay off the construction costs.
Fast forward to February 9, 2026. Trump posted on his social media outlet that he “will not allow this bridge to open until the United States is fully compensated for everything we have given them.” The “them” is Canada.
Here we go again. Trump trying to change the rules in the last quarter of the game. That is no way to conduct relationships with other countries – especially a wonderful neighbor country like Canada – and it’s no way to conduct business.
The oft-said line I heard during the 2016 presidential campaign, “We need a businessman in the White House” continues to ring hollow in my head.
And lest I forget to mention this…
The U.S. House of Representatives Oversight Committee subpoenaed former President Bill Clinton and former First Lady and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to testify regarding the Epstein files. Committee Chair James Comer, a Kentucky Republican, just knew that the Clintons would refuse to come and could then be held in contempt of Congress.
But that’s not what happened. The Clintons agreed to come and testify in a public, televised hearing. After all, Rep. Comer talks a lot about transparency. It turns out that a public hearing is not what Rep. Comer had in mind, especially since he didn’t expect the Clintons to show up.
Democrats in Congress are taking note that this will set a precedent. Forcing a former U.S. President or the family of a former U.S. President to testify before Congress has never been done before. When will today’s Republicans learn to be careful what they wish for? Woe be unto Donald Trump and his family when the Democrats win control of the Congress!
Someone must have told Trump that turnabout could be fair play someday in the future, for he started talking about how much he has always liked bill Clinton and what “a very capable woman” Hillary Clinton is. He said, “I hate to see it in many way.”
Who knew that Trump though Hillary Clinton was “a very capable woman?” Is that why he encroached on her personal space from behind like a starving vulture in that President debate that I cannot unsee?
Who knew he held the Clintons in such high regard?
I try to learn something every day, but I didn’t see that coming.
Hillary Clinton is scheduled to testify on February 26 and Bill Clinton is scheduled to testify on February 27. Oversight Committee Chair Comer says their hearings will be taped and released “later.” In Comer’s mind, that qualifies as a “public” hearing.
I have some experience with public hearings and public informational meetings. Letting the public see and hear the hearing “later” does not meet the definition of “public hearing.”
Janet
P.S. Just so you know, we aren’t giving up. I just realized I forgot to even mention environmental issues!
The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.
Janet's Writing Blog 