Is Mail-In Voting in Danger?

Maybe I’m naïve, but I don’t think thousands of illegal immigrants vote in the United States.

Maybe I’m naïve, but I don’t think thousands of dead people vote twice in every election.

As the Republicans get increasingly nervous about their loss of control over the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives if Democrats and Independents turn out to vote in the November mid-term elections, Trump issued an Executive Order to try to plant more doubt in American’s minds about the integrity of our elections.

Trump and his supporters do more than hint that he should run for a third term in 2028. (Oh, why not? Just because that is prohibited by the U.S. Constitution and just because in November 2028 he will be 82 years old?)

On March 31, 2026, he issued an Executive Order that puts onerous responsibilities on certain parts of our government regarding mail-in voting and introduces a whole new national database. It’s more than a bit Orwellian.

The irony is that Donald Trump usually mails in his ballot. He says there is a lot of fraud in the practice.

Photo by Jon Tyson on Unsplash

A little history

Trump was shocked to learn in 2020 that in many states mail-in ballots are not tabulated until election night. This can result in an election that looks like it is going in favor of one candidate an hour after the polls close going in favor of the other candidate by the end of the night. He was appalled and called it corruption.

In some states, mail-in ballots are counted as long as they are postmarked by the date of the election. Trump doesn’t like that. He wants all 160 million+ votes in the nation to be tabulated instantaneously.

He has famously accused Fulton County, Georgia poll workers of cheating, and in the process has ruined peoples’ lives. All that because he didn’t have a clue that ballots are put into containers for safekeeping.

He famously called Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and asked him to “find” him 11,780 votes on January 2, 2021. I can’t think of anything more corrupt than that in an election. Thank you, Mr. Raffensperger for not caving into the pressure of a sitting U.S. President!

And yet… even though every American has heard the recording of that phone call, 81 million of them voted for Trump to be their President again in 2024.

Trump thought he was going to beat Joe Biden in the 2020 election, and it angered him when Biden defeated him. He quickly blamed voter fraud and mail-in voting. The irony is that many Republicans won their races in that election; however, somehow it was only Donald Trump who got cheated. How can that be?

The Executive Order titled “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections” was issued by the President on March 31, 2026. It was met with opposition, but on Thursday, May 28, 2026, a federal judge declined to block it.

Although states hold the authority and responsibility to run elections and that trickles down to local election boards, this judge essentially ruled that the U.S. President has the right to tighten rules governing elections and necessitate new expenses and work for state and local governments.

The wording of Executive Order: “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections”

I was going to quote the entire Order, but it is 1,770 words long. If you want to read it in its entirety, it can be found on the White House website at https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2026/03/ensuring-citizenship-verification-and-integrity-in-federal-elections/.

Excerpts:

“Sec. 2. Establishment and Transmission of State Citizenship Lists and Prioritization of Investigations and Prosecutions Related to Election Fraud. (a) To the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law, including but not limited to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Secretary of Homeland Security, through the Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and in coordination with the Commissioners of SSA, shall take appropriate action to compile and transmit to the chief election official of each State a list of individuals confirmed to be United States citizens who will be above the age of 18 at the time of an upcoming Federal election and who maintain a residence in the subject State (State Citizenship List). The State Citizenship List shall be derived from Federal citizenship and naturalization records, SSA records, SAVE data, and other relevant Federal databases. The State Citizenship List shall be updated and transmitted to State election officials no fewer than 60 days before each regularly scheduled Federal election or promptly upon request by a State in connection with any special Federal election.”

“Sec. 3. United States Postal Service Rulemaking on Mail-In and Absentee Ballots” goes into great detail about the envelopes to be used.

“Sec. 4. Implementation.” spells out the responsibilities of the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration relating to this Executive Order. The Secretary of Homeland Security, for instance, “shall,within 90 days of the date of this order, establish the infrastructure necessary to compile, maintain, and transmit the State Citizenship List described in section 2(a) of this order and shall designate a point of contact within DHS to receive and process requests from individuals and State election officials regarding the relevant State Citizenship List. The Commissioners of SSA shall provide all necessary citizenship and identity data to the Secretary of Homeland Security in support of this requirement, consistent with applicable law, the Privacy Act, and all applicable use agreements.”

“Sec. 5. Enforcement.” spells out how “the Attorney General and the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) with relevant authority shall take all lawful steps to deter and address noncompliance… including withholding Federal funds from noncompliant States and localities…. States or localities, including any instrumentalities thereof; contractors; individuals involved in the administration of Federal elections; or public or private entities engaged in the printing, production, shipment, or distribution of ballots may be referred to the Department of Justice for consideration of investigation or charges…. States and localities should preserve, for a 5-year period, all records and materials – excluding ballots cast – evidencing voter participation in any Federal election (e.g., ballot envelops, regardless of carrier).”

“Sec. 6. Severability.” says if any part of this order “is held to be invalid,” that won’t have any bearing on the rest of the order.

“Sec. 7. General Provisions.” addresses functions of the government that will not “be construed to” be impaired or otherwise affected by this Order.

What the opposition says

The arguments against the Executive Order maintained using the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration to build “state citizenship lists” risks preventing some citizens from voting as data sources can contain errors and be out of date.

More worrisome is that at the direction of one person, individual states’ rights to regulate elections are being infringed upon. After all, according to the U.S. Constitution, states regulate elections.

The judge was asked to issue a preliminary injunction to block the Executive Order. It was reported that he seemed sympathetic to arguments against the Order on May 14; however, last Thursday he ruled that the Executive Order can go forward.

My take

Considering all the layers of data gathering, the detailed rules the United States Postal Service must follow, and the mere fact that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is the lead agency in this, what could possibly go wrong?

All one must do is remember that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is part of Homeland Security’s operations.

Since March 31, Trump kicked Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to the curb and replaced her with former U.S. Senator Markwayne Mullin, so I don’t know what that does to the Homeland Security chief’s directive in Section 4 which has a June 29, 2026 deadline.

I hope the judge’s decision on May 28 will be appealed. I hope when the case goes to the U.S. Supreme Court, some common sense will prevail.

President Trump continues to claim that there was widespread organized voter fraud in the 2020 election. He still believes that he won that election, although it has been proven repeatedly that he lost. Nothing makes him angrier than to be known as a loser.

President Trump started saying the only way he could lose an election is if the opposition cheated. When he lost, he doubled down on his claims of voter fraud. He was never able to prove voter fraud in the courts.

Supporters of Trump like to claim that dead people voted in the 2020 election and, apparently, they all voted for Joe Biden.

What we have in the Executive Order highlighted in today’s blog post is another case of issuing a solution – a very cumbersome and expensive solution — for a problem that does not exist.

I’d rather see the overturning of the Citizens United U.S. Supreme Court decision to take big business and billionaire supporters from buying our elections.

I’d rather see AI-generated political campaign TV ads outlawed.

I’d rather see our government try to block the ability of China and Russia to flood the internet and social media with bogus claims about political candidates and political parties.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Congress continues to roll over and play dead. That institution used to be a co-equal branch of the government. The U.S. Congress used to be a formidable balance against the power of the President.

On paper (the U.S. Constitution) it is legislative branch, but what we have now is rule by Executive Order instead of legislation debated and voted on by our Senators and Representatives.

I guess all my political science textbooks from the early 1970s are obsolete.

Janet

The government should be afraid of its citizens, not the other way around.

Don’t look now… more banned words in America!

On Monday, I blogged about 298 words that The New York Times reported that the Trump Regime does not want US Government agencies to use. Yesterday, I blogged about an additional 53 words and topics that PEN America identified that weren’t on The New York Times list.

I hoped that would be the end of it. Silly me!

Today we’ll consider 22 of the words and combinations of words that the US Department of Agriculture can no longer use, according to leaked memo issued by the department’s Research Services Division. The New Republic reported on the list online. The report indicated that there were dozens of other words in addition to these 22 the article highlighted.

Here we go….

  • climate
  • vulnerable
  • safe drinking water
  • greenhouse gas emissions
  • methane emissions
  • sustainable construction
  • solar energy
  • geothermal
  • nuclear energy
  • diesel
  • affordable housing
  • prefabricated housing
  • runoff
  • microplastics
  • water pollution
  • soil pollution
  • groundwater pollution
  • sediment remediation
  • water collection
  • water treatment
  • rural water
  • clean water

The New Republic article reported that according to USDA’s Northeast area financial management, travel and agreements section head, Sharon Strickland, agreement including “these terms or similar terms cannot be submitted.”

This is to ensure compliance with Trump’s Executive Orders.

A problem that Trump has not anticipated is the fact that most farm equipment runs on diesel fuel. Since he has never stepped foot on a farm, much less driven a tractor (which I have since before I was old enough to drive a car), he probably doesn’t know that.

What if microplastics are discovered in soil on a farm? There will be no way for that to be reported, so I guess we’ll have to just ignore it.

On March 29, Secretary Chris Wright of the US Department of Energy had called for the expansion of geothermal energy. On March 30, Sharon Strickland’s March 20 memo was leaked saying the USDA can’t use the word.

Is it possible that the right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing?

Can we, as citizens, utter the word “geothermal” or not? We need a user’s manual.

I do not live on a water system. I grew up and once again live out in the country and I rely on water well. Therefore, “rural water” piqued my interest. Do you know what “rural water” is?

According to the US Geological Survey, “rural water use” is “self-supplied water used in suburban or farm areas for domestic and livestock needs, and includes domestic use, drinking water for livestock, and other uses such as dairy sanitation, cleaning, and waste disposal.”

Photo of a glass of clear, clean water
Photo by engin akyurt on Unsplash

Maybe I’m biased, since I’ve drunk well water most of my life, but the above-listed uses of “rural water” sound important to me. “Safe drinking water” and “clean water” do, too.

If I’m going to eat fruits or vegetables grown on a farm or eat chicken, beef, pork, lamb, or any other meat raised on a farm or fish sold in the United States, I want to know that the water used to raise all that food was clean or relatively clean.

When I have to have a new well drilled for my household use, I’m glad that someone from the county health department is required to test that water and certify that it is safe for me to drink. If I had to depend on the USDA to do it, I would be out of luck.

And what about “soil pollution” and agriculture? If there is an oil spill on a farm, I think someone in the government should take action to monitor the situation and certify that the agricultural products coming from that farm are safe for us to consume. Do we not assume that’s something the USDA does?

Government is supposed to do those things that we cannot do for ourselves. I don’t know there was an oil spill. Even if I hear about the oil spill, I cannot visit that farm to take soil samples. I don’t have the scientific skills necessary to test those soil samples. I don’t have the scientific skill to test produce, milk, or meat samples from that farm and certify them as safe to consume.

If the USDA cannot talk about soil pollution or water pollution, where does that leave us? What about this is going to “Make America Healthy Again”?

Part of my brain is stuck in pre-January 20, 2025, so it is telling me my examples are extreme… that this would never happen in America. But fire a lot of the USDA employees and then tell the few that are still there not to use certain words. Sounds like a recipe for a disaster to me.

My thoughts

I live in North Carolina It is one of the top five pork-producing states. In 1996 and 1999, respectively, Hurricanes Fran and Floyd caused extreme flooding in the eastern part of the state… where most of the pigs are raised. Thousands of pigs drowned which caused dire and immediate health problems. Lessons were learned and safeguards were put in place for the future.

But what if another hurricane hits coastal North Carolina and in a matter of hours kills thousands of pigs? We have a State Department of Agriculture, but if you live in Kansas do you want to rely on another state to certify that the seafood coming out of the rivers and Atlantic Ocean that are downstream from those farms is safe for you to eat?

My point is that we are the United States of America, and we deserve a reliable national system of food inspection.

How is the US Department of Agriculture supposed to monitor crops or the safety of our food without using terms like water pollution, soil pollution, groundwater pollution, sediment remediation, water collection, and clean water?

How is any government agency supposed to operate without using these words?

Our country is in deep trouble when words like “clean water” cannot be used by every government agency.

Can someone please stop the madness?

Until my next blog post

Watch for my blog post tomorrow about a few of the things that have happened since January 20, 2025 – the day Trump took the oath of office without placing his hand on the Bible. A mere technicality that ten weeks after the fact doesn’t seem so important.

Pay attention to what’s happening.

Keep reading reputable nonfiction and fiction.

Don’t compromise your principles.

Remember the people of Myanmar, Thailand, Ukraine, and western North Carolina.

Janet, a disgruntled political science major